Creation science carbon dating Totally free adult mass phone chat lines
He says "Present testing shows the amount of C-14 in the atmosphere has been increasing since it was first measured in the 1950's." True, but we also know, based on the tree ring data, that it has not always been increasing.There are many periods of decreasing C-14, which disproves his theory that the earth is young based on C-14 equilibrium.
However, a "candle" can hardly be compared to "radioactive decay." These are merely empty words meant to impress his gullible readers..gives no real scientific evidence.
For More Reading How Good are those Young Earth Arguments: Carbon Dating Want to learn more about creation science?
Are the claims of young earth creation science ministries truthful?
But when I read articles about the results, they never mention the uncalibrated data, which could actually be correct. I am not an expert in every subject that impinges on the discussion, but I will do my best.
There are two reasons uncalibrated dates must be mentioned: 1) this prevents people from making up any number they please, and 2) it is for the sake of posterity, where future scientists can check the results and apply new ideas of calibration. Radiocarbon dates are affected by many outside factors.
Just this one fact totally upsets data obtained by C-14 dating." A study of plants of the past, using tree-rings, confirms a direct correlation between C-14 levels and the earth's magnetic field, over the last 8,000 years.